Worship In Action

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273107662
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Nashville, TN, US
Phone
6158028046
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Media, Communications
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$189,320
Expenses
$89,505
Assets
$151,944
Liabilities
$2,139

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DON MOEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DON MOEN (PRESIDENT)
  • JESSE SPROUL (TREASURER)
  • JIM CROSBY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Worship In Action exists to shine light on those in darkness by being the tangible hands and feet of Christ. Today, Worship In Action partners with the Royal Seed Home – the orphanage where I first met Gifty. Through the generous support of donors, we have been able to provide food, a water well, medical care, Bibles, books, and teachers’ salaries. In a milestone for our organization, we have also constructed a new school for the children; a building that can serve as the foundation for a lifetime of learning and better opportunities. I’d be honored if you’d join me today as we put our worship into action together. For His Glory,.

What it reported doing in 2025

Bring god's message to people worldwide through worship and provide for the needs of the royal seed school and orphanage including: teacher salaries, baby formula, clothing, and medical needs, dry food, school building maintenance, school curriculum, and subsistence farming and agricultural materials.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.1%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 38.1% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.