Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923351721
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Lees Summit, MO, USA
Phone
9702191959
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Veterinary Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$379,676
Expenses
$127,066
Assets
$252,610
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GEMMA CAMPLING (CEO & FOUNDER)

People named in this filing

  • GEMMA CAMPLING (CEO & FOUNDER)
  • BAILEY ROMI (DIRECTOR)
  • JACKIE HOLDSWORTH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. In order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals, vet clinics and conservation initiatives. Each of our locations is unique, but whether we are working with wild or domestic animals, helping shelters, organising sterilisation campaigns, or training local vets, the aim is the same: to improve the lives of the animals. We offer a multi-modal approach to assisting animals, including:- sending vets to areas needing support- sourcing and sending medications and equipment- educating local vets, technicians, and communities- offering volunteer programs and courses

What it reported doing in 2024

We strive to provide the best treatment possible by providing veterinary care totally free of charge, working with animals right up to the frontline, bringing in veterinary donations, supporting vets and owners with training and case support, and working with other ukrainian and international organizations. Operation ukraine: we strive to provide free veterinary care to stray, shelter and street animals in ukraine, including animals whose owners and carers are financially restricted. This includes trap-neuter-release initiatives, vaccination drives, consultations and bringing in veterinary donations. We employ local vets, animal catchers, drivers, and nurses as well as hosting international volunteersegypt vet clinic: worldwide vets is committed to providing free veterinary care for working horses and donkeys, to alleviate suffering and improve their welfare and comfort. Secondly we work with shelters to provide free vet care to dogs and cats living in shelters and on the streets. Thirdly, we run free consultation outreach missions within the community to improve the lives of farm animals.wildlife conservation. We bring free veterinary care to wildlife species in southern africa (namibia, south africa). This covers all species, but with significant focus on the rhino. We carry out painless dehorning, emergency rescue operations, and vital veterinary care to ensure the survival of rhinos in the wild. Poachers kill rhinos for their horns, but a painless and humane dehorning procedure can remove this incentive and save lives. Our experienced veterinary team darts and immobilizes rhinos safely using specialized sedatives, uses precision equipment to remove the horn without harming the animal, monitors the rhino's recovery and releases them back into the wild, reducing their risk of poaching.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 33
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Pass
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Pass
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 66.5%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $127K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.