Worldwide Trophy Adventures Outdoor Guardian Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883118910
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Shelby, MI, USA
Phone
2315786008
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,976
Expenses
$87,362
Assets
$161,042
Liabilities
$154,762

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK PETERSON (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JULIE LUND (GUARDIAN FUND MANAGER)
  • MARK PETERSON (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
  • RYAN WATCHORN (TREASURER AND DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promoting conservation and protecting natural wildlife habitats.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the 2025 calendar year, the wta outdoor guardian fund continued to expand its conservation, education, and outreach efforts through the development of new media initiatives, field projects, and strategic infrastructure investments supporting its long-term mission.in 2025, the organization launched its official brand video introducing "the guardian," the conservation pillar of worldwide trophy adventures. The video served as an important educational and outreach tool designed to increase public awareness, authentically communicate the organization's mission, and support donor development efforts. The video highlighted the fund's commitment to wildlife and fishery preservation, sustainable management, conservation, and education through field-based initiatives and strategic partnerships.the organization also launched two featured conservation projects through its website platform, including "protect the flock: wild turkey banding in Kentucky and "protect the herd: elk collaring in Nebraska." these projects included educational film content, photography, and field reporting designed to provide transparent project updates and engage the public in conservation efforts.additional project activities during 2025 included elk and sheep collaring efforts in Nebraska, wood duck banding activities in Kentucky, and a wounded warrior conservation project conducted in collaboration with boone brothers in Kentucky. The organization also participated in planning and development activities for a future jaguar darting and research project in mexico. With the exception of the jaguar initiative, most projects were structured as low-cost, collaborative opportunities that allowed the fund to maximize its conservation impact through partnerships and shared field resources. Majority of these projects should launch on the website throughout 2026. To support future public outreach and fundraising capabilities, the organization engaged a digital marketing agency to assist with implementation of the google ad grants program for eligible 501(c)(3) organizations. Throughout 2025, significant efforts were made to establish and prepare the program infrastructure, including digital advertising strategy and platform setup. The google ad grants program was fully approved and became active in early 2026, providing the organization with access to in-kind google search advertising credits to support future educational outreach, donor engagement, and public awareness initiatives.as of the end of 2025, the wta outdoor guardian fund continued to build its conservation portfolio, expand its educational media presence, and strengthen its digital outreach capabilities, positioning the organization for increased conservation impact and public engagement in future years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 32.1%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 32.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.