World Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593108990
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3212350029
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $596,984
- Expenses
- $566,063
- Assets
- $333,008
- Liabilities
- $202,632
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID JANNEY (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- DUSTIN JANNEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID JANNEY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $117,664 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission at world hope is to give the hope and love of christ to the hopeless.
What it reported doing in 2024
World hope's work in kenya, africa is a multi-faceted ministry and the largest of our centers around the globe. In november of 2000, world hope began building on an eight-acre piece of land in the middle of kawangware slum, east africa's second largest slum. The land was a garbage dump and had acquired the epithet, "hell's hole." this smoldering expanse of land was a lawless area where the worst imaginable often took place. Out of that barren place hope center has blossomed. On campus, hope church sees hundreds come to worship on sundays and be discipled throughout the week.across the dirt-paved street from the hope center is the hope academy, which is educating and feeding over 400 children daily. The hope academy, founded in 2002, has become the vehicle for hundreds of children to escape the cycle of poverty. Also located in kawangware, the school educates children from pre-school through the eleventh grade and has become a beacon of hope throughout the entire area. Every morning at hope academy children dressed in full uniform provided by world hope walk to school, some from as far away as three miles. At 10:00 am they break for a piece of bread and tea, and then again at 1:00 pm for lunch. For many of these children, this will be their only meal of the day.the children are educated by university-trained teachers and participate in the national testing service recognized throughout kenya. World hope believes that the way out of the slums is through education, and we are committed to bringing the best education possible to these children. In the last year, we have added a new building that now houses the high school for the hope academy which continues to make progress toward state-of-the-art learning materials and facilities. In addition, programs such as everlasting light, a therapy program for the highest risk students, are ensuring success on the emotional level as well.through our partnerships, hope center is home to one of the most successful sports ministries anywhere, with hundreds of young people participating in team sports that not only give them physical exercise and discipline, but also teach them about life.the hope center is changing so many lives that it is difficult to measure its impact. The effect is so far-reaching that its reputation is becoming known throughout the country of kenya. Other ministries are coming to see the great success that the lord has given to the project. As we continue to grow and expand, we praise the lord for what he has done and thank him for the many that have been given a new hope in him.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $505K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.