World Foundation for Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201007533
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Woodstock, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5404592090
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $114,020
- Expenses
- $144,606
- Assets
- $83,616
- Liabilities
- $4,123
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BLAIR (PRESIDENT &)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT BLAIR (PRESIDENT &)
- REV ROBERT HOSKINS (VICE CHAIR)
- DOUG SENSABAUGH (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The volunteer farm exists to provide food - specifically fresh locally grown produce, for the hungry in the local region. The farm uses volunteer labor to plant and harvest the crop which is then donated and distributed to the local area through the blue ridge area food bank.
What it reported doing in 2014
Since 2004 the world foundation for children, volunteer farm project has grown more than 65 tons of fresh produce for distribution to more than 129,000 hungry people through the blue ridge area food bank. The farm has more than 3,000 volunteers providing the labor for planting and harvesting the vegetables.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.