World Darts Federation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954018208
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Downey, CA, USA
Phone
3102775972
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$186,582
Expenses
$136,484
Assets
$218,512
Liabilities
$18,670

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BUDDY BARTOLETTA (PRESIDENT)
  • SABINE SHANAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE)

People named in this filing

  • BUDDY BARTOLETTA (PRESIDENT)
  • SABINE SHANAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE)
  • ZANIS BUKLOVSKIS (SPORTS ADMINISTRATOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

World darts federation, inc. Is a notforprofit organization incorporated in 1976, dedicated toward achieving and maintaining the highest possible standard of presentation and organization around the world. As a worldwide federation of darts bodies, the federation encourages the promotion of the sport of darts among and between those bodies in an effort to gain international recognition for darts as a major sport.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promoted and administered major international tournaments & sanctioned/ranked other tournaments hosted by member countries.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $102K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.