Workforce Professionals Training Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203891493
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6462785686
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,529,084
- Expenses
- $1,899,881
- Assets
- $2,464,950
- Liabilities
- $209,737
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHERAZADE LANGLADE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- SHERAZADE LANGLADE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $206,207 total reported compensation
- ANDREA VAGHY BENYOLA (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $157,871 total reported compensation
- SABEEN PIRANI (CHIEF LEARNING OFFICER): $136,110 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wpti strengthens the workforce development system by building the capacity of organizations and professionals who prepare and connect job seekers to meaningful careers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wpti supports workforce development professionals at all stages of their careers, providing the skills, knowledge, and tools they need to meet the evolving demands of their roles. In 2025, wpti delivered a comprehensive suite of professional development opportunities, combining in-person trainings, online courses, and customized programs to maximize reach and effectiveness. Wpti's "foundations in workforce development," a nine-course online series, was approved for one elective credit in youth studies at the city university of New York school of professional studies (cuny sps). Launched elevate leadership development, designed for early-mid career workforce practitioner focused on team and program management, data driven program design, and peer collaborations.wpti developed evidence-based programs and frameworks that strengthen workforce organizations and improve outcomes for jobseekers and young adults across New York city.business engagement learning lab (bell): in its 12th cycle, bell continued to be one of wpti's most in-demand professional development programs, equipping workforce professionals with the tools and strategies to build successful employer partnerships. This year also marked the launch of bell essentials, expanding access to foundational employer engagement skills.workforce systems leadership program (wslp): now in its fifth cycle, wslp welcomed 24 participants-its most diverse cohort to date-providing an intensive leadership launchpad and professional network. Wslp graduates join a growing alumni community of 142 workforce leaders driving change across the field.mentored internship program (mip): now in its seventh cycle, mip served 186 young people this year. More than 50% secured employment-through syep, agency placements, or other opportunities-and/or enrolled in higher education, demonstrating the program's strong outcomes and career pathways impact.wpti is at the forefront of helping the workforce development field understand and responsibly apply artificial intelligence to strengthen programs, improve outcomes, and prepare participants for the future of work. Wpti is creating ai resources, tools, and learning programs on the technology's benefits and risks as they pertain to the workforce development sector. As ai transforms every aspect of work, wpti will assure that both the workforce development sector and workers are prepared and ready.contributed to national standards: supported the development of the ai alliance's guide to essential competencies for ai, shaping the skills framework for equitable ai adoption in the workforce field.created practical tools and guidance: developed two cornerstone resources-using artificial intelligence with workforce and career development participants and harnessing ai responsibly in workforce development: an 18-point guide for nonprofits-to help organizations integrate ai ethically and effectively.launched the ai learning lab: introduced the ai learning lab, in collaboration with meet the moment, engaging 15 organizations in hands-on exploration of ai applications in workforce and career services.expanded access to knowledge: hosted four free public sessions on ai to democratize understanding and build confidence across the field.embedded ai across programs: updated all wpti curricula to include real-world ai use cases and applications relevant to workforce professionals.built a community of practice: established an ai advisory group to convene digital transformation experts and leaders, advise on ethical integration and adoption, and shape the responsible use of ai in workforce development.by sharing lessons learned from the field and elevating the real-world experiences of practitioners, wpti seeks to grow a broad community committed to generating greater equity through economic opportunity. When government agencies and workforce development organizations seek expertise, they turn to wpti. In 2025, wpti continued to elevate and represent the voice of New York ci
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.1%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 70.8%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.1% of revenue deployed · 70.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $206K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.