Northwest and Southwest Tennessee
Legal name: Workforce Innovations
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453853000
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dyersburg, TN, USA
- Phone
- 7-1-1
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment Procurement Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,533,377
- Expenses
- $6,554,419
- Assets
- $2,416,948
- Liabilities
- $2,191,777
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIMMY WILLIAMSON (PRESIDENT, CHAIR - DYER)
- BEN FERGUSON (VICE-PRESIDENT, CHAIR - MADISON)
- JENNIFER BANE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER BANE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $156,087 total reported compensation
- GINA JOHNSON (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $103,687 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To connect jobseekers and employers in Northwest and Southwest Tennessee through workforce development services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our services are provided throughout a seventeen (17) county area in north and southwest Tennessee. Branded as the american job centers, the organization oversees three comprehensive centers (including multiple partners) and eight (8) affiliate/specialized centers (including at least one partner). The centers provided nearly 26,000 services to over 15,200 customers for the year, such as career advising and/or job search activities, including use of computers and other technology to access job postings and partner services. Professional career advisors offer labor market information and personal assessments to match job seekers with in demand, high wage, quality jobs. Workshops including resume preparation, interviewing and networking, basic computer literacy and financial literacy, along with various online tools addressing work ethic, prepare job seekers to present themselves to employers. For job seekers who lack sufficient skills to compete for jobs, education, training and support services are arranged through american job center partners. Business service teams work with the employer community to identify necessary skills sets needed for positions and refer qualified applicants via a robust online job search engine, jobs4tn. Additional services include coordination of job fairs and hiring events; facilitating career awareness activities between students and employers; and providing labor market information. The organization may also award grants to private business and industry for on the job training of new hires and/or process improvement or skills upgrades of incumbent workers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 43% for direct work, and 57% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.9%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.91; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 96% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.