Workers United

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

17 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Organizing the unorganized collective bargaining.

To improve the wages, hours of work, job security and the working and living conditions of working men and women.

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
Grant itemization coverage: 90.6%; rating input score 91; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 53.3%; rating input score 53; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 35.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.17; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 8 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $276K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 53/100.
High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.