Work Options

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841364292
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
7206680532
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,759,940
Expenses
$2,473,743
Assets
$840,394
Liabilities
$261,693

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIE STONE (Executive Dir.): $129,113 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At Work Options, we nourish communities by using food as a force for good—feeding those facing hunger and training individuals from historically excluded backgrounds to build stable, purpose-driven culinary and hospitality careers. Our Vision. Supported through culinary job training and employment services 0 % of Program GRADUATES REMAIN employed 90 DAYS after graduation. Get the latest updates from Work Options and read about the achievements of our students and program. Subscribe Now Facebook Instagram Linkedin Youtube.

What it reported doing in 2025

Food Provisions: In 2025, Work Options provided a total of 111,410 nutritious meals to individuals and families experiencing food insecurity and housing instability.- 109,000 fully prepared, nourishing meals were delivered to residents of Colorado Villages Micro Communities at the Monroe and Steele sites, providing three meals per day to individuals transitioning out of homelessness.- 2,260 meals were provided to Work Options program participants, all of whom experience food insecurity, supporting daily access to breakfast and lunch during training and employment preparation.- Located at the Mosaic Campus, which also serves Denver Public Schools and low income seniors and families, Work Options launched its first Thanksgiving community meal in 2025, serving 150 neighbors at no cost to them. This initiative will continue as an annual community tradition in the years ahead. We plan to feed 250 for 2026.Culinary Job Training & Employment Services: In 2025, Work Options provided culinary job training and employment services to 230 adults from historically excluded backgrounds, many of whom experienced justice involvement, homelessness, trauma, or long-term unemployment.- Out of 230 enrolled, 210 participants (91%) successfully completed culinary job training, exceeding program completion targets.- 148 graduates (70%) secured employment in the culinary and hospitality sector following program completion.- 69% graduates remained employed six months after placement, demonstrating sustained workforce engagement.- Participants earned 1,537 industry-recognized certifications, including ServSafe Food Handler, Restaurant Ready, and Allergen certifications.- Training delivery included 5,980 hours of job readiness instruction, 25,300 hours of hands-on kitchen training, and 2,806 hours of individualized case management support.In addition to workforce outcomes, program participants contributed directly to community food security by preparing 111,410 nutritious meals for individuals transitioning out of homelessness, program participants experiencing food insecurity, and neighbors served through community meal initiatives, reinforcing Work Options integrated model of workforce development and large-scale food access.Student Demographic Info: Work Options serves a highly diverse population facing significant and compounded economic and social barriers. Many of our students hold multiple intersecting identities and have experienced stigma and discrimination, which have limited their access to stable employment and economic opportunity. Participants identify as 43% female, 54% male, 2% non-binary, and 1% LGBTQIA+. Eighty-one percent identify as people of color, including 32% African American, 18% multiracial, 17% Hispanic/Latinx, and 14% Asian American, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander. Most participants are working age adults, with 82% ages 25 to 64 and 15% ages 18 to 24. Many face systemic barriers, including 64% whoare justice involved, 29% with felony convictions, 64% who have experienced homelessness,46% living with invisible disabilities, 41% survivors of domestic violence, and 18% formerly in foster care. These demographics reflect Work Options commitment to expanding food access and employment opportunities for those disproportionately impacted by poverty and instability.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.5%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 74.5% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.