Woodstock Wolverine Lacrosse Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822609597
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Woodstock, GA, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,250
Expenses
$80,039
Assets
$4,212

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Vanessa Kessinger (President)
  • Serena Newhall (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Vanessa Kessinger (President)
  • Serena Newhall (Vice President)
  • Stacy Gorman (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Woodstock Wolverine Lacrosse Booster Club Inc. also doing business as - Woodstock High School Boys Lacrosse Club is to support the boys lacrosse program at Woodstock High School and feeder program. In the following manner but not limited to: A. Promote parent student involvement B. Coordinate all supporting activities C. Encourage attendance at lacrosse related functions D. Provide those services facilities and equipment which are not provided for by the school E. Ensure recognition for the boys lacrosse program and its athletes. We believe that participation in the lacrosse program instills qualities such as discipline integrity respect and perseverance. We believe as parents it is our responsibility to support our students in all they do and that as the boosters of the lacrosse program we can support a program that is important to our students their school and the community.

What it reported doing in 2025

We successfully completed 2 seasons fall and spring added 2 additional teams to grow the lacrosse community. This programs now serves 5 teams.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.