Woodstock Area Council on Aging

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
030295419
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Woodstock, VT, USA
Phone
8024573277
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,713,292
Expenses
$1,110,188
Assets
$8,078,142
Liabilities
$93,227

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROLYN KIMBELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KAREN ROSENE-MONTELLA (PRESIDENT)
  • DEANNA JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEANNA JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $100,781 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The thompson center helps older adults to age well in our rural community. We provide timely support and services, and are a resource and advocate on issues related to aging. Our programs and activities foster the physical, intellectual, and social well being of our adult community to enhance dignity, self-worth, and independence.

What it reported doing in 2024

Healthy aging & wellness programs and support, computer and exercise programs, language programs and other social events. Over 1,600 participants in education, wellness, and fitness programs; and over 28,000 interactions and contacts at social events, enrichment opportunities and dining.during 2024, the thompson center launched a capital fundraising campaign to raise $4 million toward the renovation of the building. Previously raised and held funds in unrestricted investments were allocated to funding the long term goal. In september 2024, the thompson center entered into a $3.2 million renovation contract with a local builder. Renovation began in september and was expected to take 14 months until completion. Additional project costs outside of builder costs include kitchen equipment, accessories, communication equipment, and furniture and window treatments. In fye 2025, a total of $2,846,505 was received in contributions toward the capital project. A total of $3,535,827 was expended on the capital project in fy 2025. The building renovation work under the builder contract was largely completed by 9/30/2025. Additional upgrades, equipment purchases, and exterior work not included in the builder contract and within the $4 mil budget remain to be completed on a schedule as determined by the thompson. Capital contributions not yet expended are held in investments as donor restricted. On september 19th, 2024, one of the thompson center's loyal patrons passed away, leaving the thompson center his real property at 1274 w. Woodstock road, woodstock, vt. The property included a 2 bedroom house, a one car garage, and 2.29 acres of land. The property's estimated value at 9/30/2024 was $345,000. Subsequently, the thompson center sold the property on september 19, 2025 for $360,000

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 26.7%; rating input score 27
  • Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $47.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.28; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 26.7% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $883K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 20 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $558K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.