Woodlands Chinese School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200888034
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Conroe, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8327905242
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Specialized Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,574
- Expenses
- $61,847
- Assets
- $40,096
- Liabilities
- $48,010
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Xiaoni Liu (President)
People named in this filing
- Xiaoni Liu (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations mission is to promote the learning and appreciation of the Chinese language and culture by providing accessible educational programs to children, families, and other members of the community. The organization seeks to develop students Chinese communication skills, increase their understanding of Chinese traditions and cultural heritage, and encourage cross-cultural understanding within the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the tax year, the organization furthered its educational and charitable purposes by operating Chinese-language and cultural education programs for members of the local community. The organization provided structured instruction at multiple proficiency levels, allowing students with different language backgrounds and abilities to develop Chinese speaking, listening, reading, and cultural knowledge. The programs also provided students and families with opportunities to learn about and participate in Chinese cultural traditions, thereby promoting cultural awareness, preserving Chinese heritage, and encouraging greater understanding between Chinese and American communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.6%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.2; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.