Woodland Senior Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942472331
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Woodland, CA, USA
Phone
5306612001
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,644
Expenses
$81,279
Assets
$178,243
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROY MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • MAXINE POLKINGHORNE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHARON COULOMBE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROY MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • MAXINE POLKINGHORNE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KATHY HARRYMAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide social, recreationa, and cultural programs for senior citizens in the greator woodland, ca area and to provide them health, financial, housing, legal, and transportation information so as to promote their wellbeing.

What it reported doing in 2025

More than 54,000 individual services have been rendered and accomplished during the past year through senior programming. The woodland senior center serves approximately 200 to 300 individuals each day. Staff provides information regarding health, financial, housing, transportation, legal, and any services necessary for the wellbeing of adults aged fifty and over. Referrals are made as needed. Social, recreational, and cultural programs are provided. The staff provides direct service to senior groups and individuals, coordinates volunteer efforts, and provides staff support. In addition, staff schedules the use of the senior center facility for classes, rentals, and community organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.