Woodland Celtic Games and Festival Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821113995
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Rancho Cordova, CA, USA
Phone
5308673209
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,850
Expenses
$2,132
Assets
$6,275

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGIE RODDAN (President)
  • JOHN DALEY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ANGIE RODDAN (President)
  • JOHN DALEY (Vice President)
  • MARY HUSTLER (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission is to provide an arena for celtic competitions and arts, provide education and entertainment to the public on "things celtic" in all their cultural aspects. As well to generate funds for charitable gifts that are offered by the woodland celtic games & festival.

What it reported doing in 2020

A 2 day event is produced for the benefit of the community to share the celtic cultures and competitions and arts. The event takes place in april. The community enjoys food, culture, music and sport rich in celtic heritage. Due to covid, the event did not take place this year, however many expenses for the event had to be paid, regardless of the fact that the event was not able to be carried out. Due to covid there were no games, however there were expenses to prepare for future games.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.1%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.94; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -171.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -77.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.1% of revenue deployed · 55.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.