Womens Professional Forum Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581476618
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Greensboro, NC, USA
Phone
3362729777
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,504
Expenses
$70,308
Assets
$60,297
Liabilities
$62

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LORRI YASKIEWICZ (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER MENCARINI (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • AMY MEINECKE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ASHLEY RAPER (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CHANDRA HACKENBRUCH (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT)
  • ERICA PARKER (PAST PRESIDENT/NOMINATING)

People named in this filing

  • LORRI YASKIEWICZ (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER MENCARINI (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • AMY MEINECKE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Womens professional forum's purpose is to support women on a professional level; to learn from each member by sharing professional information, experience, ideas; to develop and influence confidence as women executives; and to educate and encourage women to aspire to higher career goals.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization brings together professional women to share information, ideas and experiences to enhance their careers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 62.6%; rating input score 63

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 62.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.