Womens Leadership Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872553916
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6145567655
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,000
- Expenses
- $48,000
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHANEL JACK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ADRIENNE WALKER (BOARD MEMBER)
- KAILYND YANCEY (BOARD MEMBER)
- MARIAN GULLAD (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to collaborate, empower, educate, and strengthen our community of women and girls with honest conversations, and curriculum. We want to promote a mindset that focuses on the betterment and wellness of self, and our girl culture. We want to challenge the girls to get rid of beliefs that put them against other women. We believe that giving our community the right resources and support in loving themselves will allow them to love others and put an end to the girl-ongirl violence.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024 girl code successfully launched its first summer program serving at-risk teen girls through a five-week leadership and media empowerment initiative. The program provided mentorship mental health support and workshops on media literacy healthy relationships conflict resolution and professional development. Participants engaged in a group project addressing social issues impacting girls culminating in a graduation showcase. With a faith-based foundation the program fostered emotional resilience critical thinking and leadership skills. By offering educational incentives and parental support girl code created a transformative experience that empowered young women to navigate challenges and advocate for change in their communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.