Womens Collegiate Gymnastics Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721613810
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Glenshaw, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4124037854
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,233
- Expenses
- $185,018
- Assets
- $57,161
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
People named in this filing
- Casey Jo MacPherson (BOD Chair)
- Jennifer Green US Air Force A (Director)
- Jason Bauer (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the wcga is to provide the best possible experience for our student-athlete's by actively developing and managing the sport of women's gymnastics.
What it reported doing in 2024
Social Media & Marketing is funded by sponsorships in order to promote the organization and the sport of women's gymnastics to fans and other coaches outside of the organization. There are currently 85 member universities within WCGA with over a thousand student athletes that will be better served by additional outreach and growth of the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 20.9%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 20.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.