Womens Art Center of the Hamptons Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874010592
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- East Hampton, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6319537695
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $437,191
- Expenses
- $412,360
- Assets
- $429,274
- Liabilities
- $230,165
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE JENSEN (PRESIDENT)
- WENDY VAN DEUSEN (VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- WENDY VAN DEUSEN (VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $120,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The women's art center of the hamptons supports and elevates women thinkers and makers through educational initiatives, community programs, exhibitions and events for the enjoyment and enrichment of the human spirit with accessibility for all.
What it reported doing in 2025
Women's art center of the hamptons (wach) provides a platform to showcase women in the arts from which everyone can enjoy, engage, and learn. Last year was our first full year filled with exciting programming that appealed to people of all backgrounds. Our exhibition, luster - textile/tactile that opened in november 2024, continued through january 2025 and featured 5 local and international artists. This show was very popular and welcomed over 200 people throughout its run, which ended on january 26.in february, we presented the exhibition, shades of winter, that featured 5 artists working in painting, mixed media and ceramics. This exhibition drew 175 people through march 30.on april 26, we opened our third exhibition of the year, the grid, centered on four artists. The grid featured two standing room only artist talks and was on view through may 18. This exhibition was one of our most popular shows, drawing over 350 in april and may.our wach travels program continued to flourish, offering a cultural tour to spain in may that explored the art, architecture and design in madrid, bilbao, cordoba and grenada with 18 participants. In october, we journeyed to south korea with 15 travelers to discover the creative and cultural spirit of this country that seamlessly weaves modernity with a storied history dating back thousands of years.a two-part exhibition, infinite woman i and infinite woman ii featured 11 artists working in a wide array of media. This exhibition welcomed over 300 people through its opening receptions and open days.tiffany shlain's dendrofemonology - a feminist history tree ring opened on june 21 to an enthusiastic crowd of 100. This installation examines the timeline of the story of women and power in society through a deodar cedar tree ring. The exhibition drew an additional 100 visitors through july 4.on july 5, we presented the package project, an immersive installation and hands-on art experience that invited participants to create a package based on memory and lived experiences. 20 visitors created packages that became part of a traveling exhibition.wach held three ikebana workshops in july, connecting participants - 15 in each class - to the ancient japanese art of flower arranging. An end-of-summer artist conversation, a passion for textiles - stories from the cloth was presented on september 4 with over 50 people in attendance. The dialogue featured three fabric designers working as artists, costume designers, and philanthropists.our next exhibition, understories, opened on september 28 and presented the work of 6 artists, working in painting, sculpture, mixed media, and photography. The attendance for this exhibition was 200, including its opening reception.in october, we led a trip to discover the culture, cuisine, and history of south korea. We had 15 travelers on this wach travels adventure.our final exhibition of the year, something red, presented the work of 5 artists working in painting, sculpture, glass and mixed media. An artist talk was also held in support of the exhibition. Over 225 visitors saw the exhibition through january 25, 2026.a holiday ikebana workshop was held on december 18 with 18 participants who created arrangements and centerpieces to take home based on the ancient japanese art of flower design.last year wach lived up to its mission of providing a platform for women in the arts for everyone, a mutually beneficial undertaking that we will build upon in 2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $336K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.