Women's Resource Center of Racine Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391356335
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Racine, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2626333274
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,721,869
- Expenses
- $1,083,940
- Assets
- $1,503,355
- Liabilities
- $67,443
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JORI CHAMBERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KRISTEEN KLEPP (PRESIDENT)
- PENNY LYTER ANTONNEAU (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JORI CHAMBERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $70,957 total reported compensation
- PAMELA HANDROW (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $44,850 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The women's resource center (wrc), is a not for profit agency dedicated to providing crisis intervention services to women and children who are victims of domestic abuse and sexual assault, thus promoting positive changes in the community and in the lives of the victims of domestic violence and children we serve. Wrc provides a safe place in the community to which victims of domestic violence and their children can confidently turn when facing crises. With this in mind, wrc is dedicated to providing a nurturing and supportive atmosphere that fosters the growth of self-esteem and independent decision-making. All services provided through wrc work to increase safety and self-sufficiency for the victims of domestic violence and sexual assault whom we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wrc provides shelter for victims of domestic abuse through several areas of focus. Safety is our number one concern for our clients and their children. A personalized safety plan is prepared and reviewed with each client. We provide advocacy and assistance which can include employment and housing. We provide domestic violence education and support. Our domestic violence educators help our clients make decisions, discuss problems, heal from the abuse, and set goals for their future. Support groups help our clients get support from other victims, discuss concerns and get the support needed to make choices. In addition to these services to clients, we provide education through a safe start program for healthy relationships for youth ages 9 to 18. Our hand2hand program provides supervised and monitored visits and safe exchange program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $240.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $891K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $71K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.