Wizo USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133041381
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, United States
Phone
212-751-6461
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,749,521
Expenses
$6,852,281
Assets
$17,698,636
Liabilities
$272,625

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUTHY BENOLIEL (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • MIREILLE MANOCHERIAN (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • JANA FALIC (HONORARY LIFE PRESIDENT)
  • JUDIT GROISMAN (HONORARY LIFE PRESIDENT, ADVISOR)
  • GAIL PERL (HONORARY LIFE PRESIDENT)
  • MERCEDES IVCHER (FOUNDING PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LILACH OHAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NY): $220,964 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

WIZO USA is dedicated to the advancement of the status of women, the education and welfare of children, the care of the elderly, and the protection of the most vulnerable members of Israeli society. Five schools provide shelter and education for over 5,500 students, ensuring that no child falls between the cracks. []( Our Women. Community Centers provide programs and support for mature adults. Stay Connected Follow. 182 Day Care Centers provide care for over 15,000 children while giving young families the tools they need to improve their quality of life. []( Our Youth. Two Battered Women’s Shelters and 100 programs for women’s empowerment aid thousands of women in dire situations. []( Our Community Centers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Wizo USA funds welfare institutions in israel including: a. Day care centers that serve children whose parents must work long hours. Wizo day care centers provide a safe haven where every child's emotional and developmental needs are met. B. Schools and youth villages, including dormitories to house at risk youth. Funds for the youth villages and dormitories enable all children access to academic and vocational programming. Wizo youth villages ensure every student has tools to excel and compete in a complex global environment. The villages help students realize their academic and social potential and provide opportunities that would otherwise be unavailable. C. Two shelters for women and their children that provide a secret and safe residence for families escaping domestic violence. Women living in wizo shelters are offered vocational training, therapies, and skill building workshops to prepare them for independent living. D. A center for the prevention of violence in the family. The center serves to prevent the cycle of violence in the family through intervention and ongoing therapeutic support. The center provides the only men's hotline in israel, established to prevent violent incidences. E. Community centers providing much needed after school activities for neighborhood children including sports, academic tutoring and therapeutic programming shelter open during covid quarantine for women and their children fleeing dangerous partners. Activities for neighborhood children including sports, academic tutoring and therapeutic programming. F. Foster homes mishpachton family unit: for students that require special assistance to progress in their studies and personal issues, provides a foster home where students live as a cohesive family through their high school. The "parents" of this family are actually trained social workers who provide the structure, supervision, and nurturing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 74.9%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 74.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $221K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $114K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.