Women's Crisis Support Team

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930763734
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Grants Pass, OR, USA
Phone
5414763877
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,088,808
Expenses
$911,272
Assets
$2,247,399
Liabilities
$288,178

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAYFORD DINKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TYLER ESPINOSA (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RAYFORD DINKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $80,915 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The women's crisis support team is a non-profit organization dedicated to ending domestic violence and sexual assault through intervention, prevention, education and safe shelter.

What it reported doing in 2024

Women's crisis support team's (wcst) program services provide temporary shelter, hotline and crisis counseling to women and families at risk for domestic and sexual violence. Educate the public about these issues and provide direct assistance to women and families fleeing intolerable situations. Wcst is a non-profit organization dedicated to ending the cycle of domestic violence and sexual assault in josephine county through intervention, prevention, and safe shelter. Wcst was formed in 1977 as the women's coalition of josephine county, and operated entirely as a volunteer program and hot line for rape victims. In 1980 the organization changed its name, expanded its scope, and incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, dedicated to the struggle against both domestic violence and sexual assault. Wcst has evolved into one of the community's most active, recognized, and respected non-profit organizations. One thing will never change; wcst's commitment to helping survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault and to mitigating the physical, emotional and societal damage caused by violence in the home. The women's crisis support team has become a recognized leader in implementing primary violence prevention programs and community building curricula in grants pass area schools and in the community at large. Primary prevention involves efforts to reduce the incidence of violent acts among a population before it occurs. Our strategies introduce new values, thinking processes, and relationship skills to particular population groups that are imcompatible with violence and that promote healthy, non violent relationships.while quantifying the success of wcst's particular prevention strategies remains difficult, we have been fully recognized by school and community leaders alike as a significant asset to the collective grants pass community effort to reduce violence and sexual assault. The wcst prevention program has also been instrumental in bringing an americorps volunteer to the grants pass community for the purpose of outreach to the community and schools to end violence and build community. In december 1998, with strong community support, we opened a safe shelter for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in grants pass. Wcst operates talsunne house, a 15 bed safe shelter for women and children. This is the only shelter program currently available for residents of josephine county. During the last 18 years, we kept over 4,000 women and children safe from harm.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 65% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.5%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.3%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.47; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.5% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $638K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.