Women's Bureau Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351367133
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2604247977
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $511,013
- Expenses
- $709,715
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LOAINE HAGERTY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LOAINE HAGERTY (CEO): $59,575 total reported compensation
- CINDY GLOVER (CFO): $26,007 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancing women through advocacy, education, and economic empowerment.
What it reported doing in 2018
Transitions is a substance abuse treatment program for women. Transitions offers residential treatment averaging 6-9 months and outpatient aftercare for continued recovery after discharge for transitions residents upon successful in-house program completion. Opened in 1996, this family-focused program is the only long-term treatment facility for recovering women that allows their children to reside with them during treatment in northeast Indiana. Transitions is certified by the Indiana division of mental health as an "addictions service provider and is a carf-accredited residential substance abuse treatment provider. The program includes group education to teach recovery skills, parenting skills, life management, and more. Individual counseling is offered weekly for all residents to address the underlying causes of their addiction and the trauma which often has been a part of their lives. The goal at discharge is to empower families to not only be healthier but also more capable of becoming self-sufficient household units in the community. Nearly 95% of transitions' clients are single parents with limited family support. More than 50% of them meet the criteria for homelessness at admission. Many transitions clients do not have a safe environment in which to reside upon discharge from the program. The children who are admitted with their mothers range in age from infancy to 12 years, with children up to 17 years of age hosted for visitation. Many women enter the program while pregnant and deliver their infant while in residence at transitions. The vast majority of children are chins ("children in need of services" as a result of parental neglect or abuse). For children who have been raised in an addictive environment, program services that impart structure, routines, and healthy role-modeling of appropriate situational behaviors are crucial. Transitions strives to provide that structure for the children while helping their mothers obtain and maintain a life of recovery from drug and alcohol addiction.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -38.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $554K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.