Women's Advocate Ministry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133384470
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2122807320
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,832
Expenses
$20,043
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOROTHY TANANBAUM (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTONIO MCCLOUD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANNIE M BOVIAN (EXEC DIRECTOR)
  • DOROTHY TANANBAUM (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTONIO MCCLOUD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide active outreach, crisis intervention, referral and supportive services to incarcerated women and their children.

What it reported doing in 2013

This program provides support to pretrial and sentenced women in the New York city prison system and their children. Staff and volunteer advocates provide help and support in court, make visits to women in prison, and provide support to the women's families. Support is provided for women ready for release and to help them to successfully reenter society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.5%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 44.7%; rating input score 45

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -59.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.5% of revenue deployed · 44.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.