Women Photographers International Archive Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832565094
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7869703381
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Film, Video
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $378,753
- Expenses
- $326,546
- Assets
- $115,928
- Liabilities
- $6,835
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALDEIDE DELGADO PUEBLA (PRESIDENT)
- FRANCISCO MASO ALFONSO (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALDEIDE DELGADO PUEBLA (PRESIDENT): $61,000 total reported compensation
- FRANCISCO MASO ALFONSO (VICE-PRESIDENT): $34,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to highlight the contribution of women photographers to modern and contemporary art, with the goal of rewriting the artistic canon and inspiring social change.
What it reported doing in 2024
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITIONS: Embracing the power of women, photography, and free expression, WOPHA benefits over 2,000 participants and 7,500 exhibition viewers annually, with an extended reach through its accessible website. WOPHAs core programsthe WOPHA Congress, exhibitions, educational initiatives, artist residencies, and fellowshipsadvance its mission to support women and non-binary photographers. The triennial WOPHA Congress fosters dialogue on photographys cultural and social impact. Its 2024 edition featured 56 prominent artists, curators, and art historians from over 15 countries. Spanning 10 locations across South Florida, the Congress included keynotes, panels, exhibitions, masterclasses, portfolio reviews, photowalks, performances, and other programs. WOPHAs residencies and fellowships promote cultural exchange while furthering Miami as a meeting place for the international photography community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 32.8%; rating input score 33
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 36.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 32.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $61K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.