Women of Hope Project Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542067262
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Va Beach, VA, USA
- Phone
- 2408646111
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,377
- Expenses
- $103,687
- Assets
- $60,845
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wohp was established for women by women. Our mission is to restore hope, dignity and empowerment to afghan women who have been oppressed and denied personal freedom, health, opportunity and respect. Wohp seeks to develop an encouraging support network that provides resources to help these women recover from the traumatic devastation of decades of war.we aim to promote lasting change in the lives of the afghan women as follows:"help them to regain their confidence and their united voice; "encourage their families to recognize their value; and "create a sisterhood of women around the world to provide the helping hands they need to rise above the ashes of their broken lives. Today, wohp's mission has expanded to help hundreds of children return to school and to offer vocational training to men. By learning and working an income-producing trade, men and women become contributing members of society, strengthening themselves, their families, and their communities.
What it reported doing in 2010
Provide resources to restore hope and dignity and encourage opportunities for self-sufficiency to afghan women and their families. Provide training programs and resources supporting daily food and food security needs, economic development opportunities, and vocational and business training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.1%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 67.4%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.1% of revenue deployed · 67.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.