Women Leading Ed

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990436915
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Matthews, NC, USA
Phone
4794263816
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$772,504
Expenses
$285,524
Assets
$495,335
Liabilities
$8,355

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIA RAFAL-BAER (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • EMILY HARTNETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMILY HARTNETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $56,417 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The goal of women leading ed (wle) is to be a nationally recognized network committed to supporting and advancing female education leadership through research, education, advocacy, and engagement with women at every stage of their leadership journeys. Our mission is to grow and strengthen a strong pipeline of women leaders through individual/group coaching, cohort-based leadership training programs, peer-to-peer network building, crisis support, and practical learning opportunities to build women's skills and resiliency to sustain long-term in the sector. Wle's vision is that those who lead school systems represent the communities and systems they serve and that our systems are rebuilt and redesigned to match the changing needs of our generation. Wle endeavors to elevate the leadership, voices and influence of women education and to leading more inclusive efforts to improve education. Its purpose is to identify, strengthen, and sustain diverse, high-potential woman education leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

The goal of women leading ed (wle) is to be a nationally recognized network committed to supporting and advancing female education leadership through research, education, advocacy, and engagement with women at every stage of their leadership journeys. Our mission is to grow and strengthen a strong pipeline of women leaders through individual and group coaching, cohort-based leadership training programs, peer-to-peer network building, crisis support, and practical learning opportunities to build women's skills and resiliency to sustain long-term in the sector. Wle's vision is that those who lead school systems represent the communities and systems they serve and that our systems are designed to match the changing needs of our generation. Wle endeavors to elevate the leadership, voices and influence of women education and to leading more intentional efforts to improve education. Its purpose is to identify, strengthen, and sustain high-potential woman education leaders.numerous education leadership and certification programs exist, but almost none have been created by and for women leaders. Wle seeks to change this by providing a safe, confidential, and supportive network of women education leaders that provides development and community and help the women in the network secure and retain the top role of districts and states in our nation.wle provides leadership programs and networking opportunities with the intentional focus of supporting women in education. Wle surveys women to identify the areas most top of mind as they navigate becoming, and sustaining as, leaders. In particular, wle researches and provides programming highlighting the experiences of women and women of color during their leadership journey and their rise to the superintendency.among wle programming are a variety of coaching and networking opportunities, including: individual and group coaching, including support entering and advancing in searches, and building the foundations for long-term impact; monthly virtual meetings and access to experts, including current and former women superintendents; and facilitated peer networking within and across cohorts and practical learning opportunities to build skills and resilience as women go for the top jobs and sustain in them for the long-run. One hundred percent of wle's time is spent on programming.individual and group coaching, including support entering and advancing in searches and building the foundations for long term impact. Held virtually and at various locations, funded by grants, donations and fees.monthly virtual meetings and access to experts, including current and former women superintendents. Held virtually, funded by grants and donations.facilitated peer networking within and across our ever-expanding cohorts. Held virtually and at various locations, funded by grants and donations.practical learning opportunities to build skills and resilience as women go for the top jobs and sustain in them for the long-run. Held virtually and at various locations, funded by grants, donations and fees.annual summit national network of female superintendents and those leaders who aspire to land the top ceo roles in districts and states for three days of empowering speaker sessions, networking with peers, collective agenda setting and leadership coaching. Including executive coaching and leadership development sessions. Held in charlotte, North Carolina, funded by donations and fees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $259K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $56K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.