Women Founders Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822082132
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
La Canada, CA, USA
Phone
3107418514
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,632
Expenses
$137,840
Assets
$146,885
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARYA ALLEN-ATTAR (CEO & CO-FOUNDER)

People named in this filing

  • DARYA ALLEN-ATTAR (CEO & CO-FOUNDER)
  • ANNE PLECHNER (COO)
  • MARK WALD (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Women founders network is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that provides education on entrepreneurship and investing to women and girls.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, we continued and expanded our educational programming for high school girls, college women and female entrepreneurs.next generation investorsthe junior venture capitalist (jr. Vc) program (formerly known as the junior judge program) for high school girls had 7 virtual meetings with women business leaders to learn about entrepreneurship, leadership, venture capital and career opportunities. Girls also participated in a facilitated review of the women founders network fast pitch finalist companies with a seasoned investor and attended an in-person practice pitch event. The jr. Vc program culminated in the girls attending the annual women founders network fast pitch event at ucla in los angeles. The girls watched the pitches, asked follow-up questions of the founders, then deliberated to select their winner and presented a sponsored cash prize. We increased the participant number from 65 in-person students last year to 83 students in 2025, and increased the virtual jr. Vc program for non-local students from 27 participants last year to 38 students this year. For the fifth year, we had our due diligence analyst program for university women (formerly known as wff fellows program). The program offers real-world, resume-building experience. Students were selected through an application process, had 2 zoom sessions to learn about performing due diligence on early stage startups and given access to resource materials. Participants worked in teams of two with a mentor. Each team was assigned to evaluate one of the fast pitch finalist companies and present a due diligence report. We had 39 applicants, with 20 participants accepted into the program.female entrepreneursour startup fundamentals webinar series included topics on pitch deck essentials, scalable startup funding, valuation and negotiation, financial forecasts, cap table basics, retaining ownership rights, and pr/marketing strategies. Our in-person launch event with over 60 attendees featured a panel of women investors and a previous fast pitch winner sharing fundraising strategies for startups. The 13th annual fast pitch competition received 185 applications and 10 finalists were selected to participate in the program. Each founder is provided a pitch coach, pro bono financial consulting, a package of professional services, and perks for discounts on a wide array of products and services. The fast pitch finalists also participate in two practice pitch events for friendly feedback in preparation to compete for cash grants at our annual fast pitch event at ucla, which was attended by over 300 people. We awarded $55,000 in non-dilutive cash grants to the winning founders in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 62.9%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 62.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.