Wolf Conservation Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134073912
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- South Salem, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9147632373
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protection of Endangered Species
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,724,328
- Expenses
- $3,026,844
- Assets
- $14,696,342
- Liabilities
- $105,945
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARTHA HANDLER (PRESIDENT)
- TRIPP KILLIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LEILA WETMORE (EXEC DIRECTOR FROM 12/13/24): $15,833 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The wolf conservation center (wcc) is an environmental education organization working to advance the survival of wolves by inspiring a global community through education, advocacy, research, and participating in the federal recovery and release programs for two critically endangered wolf species - the mexican gray wolf and red wolf. The wcc's two education wolves reside on exhibit where they help teach the public about wolves and their vital role in the environment. Through wolves, the wcc teaches the broader message of conservation, ecological balance, and personal responsibility for improved human stewardship of our world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wild release - endangered wolf recoverythe wcc continues to provide a safe and nurturing environment for the critically endangered red wolves and endangered mexican gray wolves entrusted to its care. And while most wolves born in captivity spend their lives there, 12 mexican gray wolf pups born at the wolf conservation center have been given the extraordinary opportunity to live in the wild in their ancestral range. Most recently, five pups born in 2024 were fostered into wild mexican gray wolf dens in New Mexico.at just under 14 days old, the pups were flown to New Mexico and successfully placed in a wild den through a process known as "pup-fostering." pup-fostering is a coordinated effort between the mexican gray wolf interagency field team (ift) and the mexican wolf saving animals from extinction program and is a technique employed to enhance the genetic health of the wild gene pool of mexican wolves. Captive-born pups are introduced into a similar-aged wild litter so the pups can grow up as wild wolves and aid in the recovery of their endangered species.according to u.s. Fish and wildlife service (usfws) mexican gray wolves within the wild population are as related to one another as full siblings. This pup-foster recovery technique provides the opportunity to augment the population's genetics with the hope the pups will eventually spread their genes to the greater population.the wcc has been a critical partner in the mexican gray wolf recovery program for nearly two decades. The goal of the recovery plan is to restore mexican gray wolves to a portion of their ancestral range in the southwest united states and mexico. To date, three adult mexican gray wolves from the center have been released in the wild and 12 pups have been fostered. Wcc research lab established in 2021, the integrative ecology and coexistence lab focuses on the ecology and conservation of mammalian carnivores.a strategic goal for the wcc research lab is to grow into a hub for research, education, and outreach on the management and conservation of wildlife with an emphasis on wolves and coyotes. Because these areas have applied relevance, they are well-suited for influencing conservation policies, engaging the public in advocacy, and advancing wcc's mission.the directions for the research at wcc involves building off ongoing projects focused on understanding the distribution, ecology, and population dynamics of red wolves, coyotes, and red wolf-coyote hybrid populations in the southeastern united states as well as establishing research in the mid-atlantic to assist in addressing pressing conservation needs in the region.ongoing projects: gulf coast canine project: this is a large-scale effort to survey canid populations along coastal Louisiana and Texas for red wolf ancestry to determine their ecology and taxonomy and assess the region for potential red wolf reintroduction.the red wolf reintroduction suitability project: this study involves identifying potential areas for reintroducing red wolves within their historic range and to predict the suitability of those areas for recovery.eastern canis taxonomy project: this is a comprehensive assessment of the red wolf's evolution and its relatedness to other canis species in north america using morphological, genetic, and ecological data.expanding horizons in wolf education and awarenessat the heart of our educational mission lies the drive to consistently amplify awareness about wolves and combat the prevailing stigmas surrounding them. In 2024, the wcc continued to educate about wolves through in-person and digital outreach, innovatively engaging broader audiences both locally and globally. We offered 570 onsite programs, reaching more than 14,000 people. Through our virtual platforms, wolf enthusiasts spanning from australia to ireland to California gained deeper insights into the pivotal role wolves play in families and ecosystems. These enthusiasts also fostered a renewed appreciation for recognizing the
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.86; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 64.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $16K · 15 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $433K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.