Wnr Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043419920
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Oak Bluffs, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5086966465
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,004,382
- Expenses
- $6,955,222
- Assets
- $5,160,593
- Liabilities
- $2,238,477
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wnr, inc. Provides inpatient skilled nursing services to individuals requiring such care due to physical condition or infirmity.
What it reported doing in 2010
The provision of inpatient skilled nursing services to individuals requiring such care due to physical condition or infirmity. 25,713 patient days of care provided in 2010.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 68.4%; rating input score 68; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.