WL Band Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932348210
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Collinsville, MS, USA
Phone
6016923620
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music

Reported finances

Revenue
$136,155
Expenses
$124,715
Assets
$23,894
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michelle Joyner (President)
  • William Combs (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Michelle Joyner (President)
  • William Combs (Vice President)
  • Lisa Oates (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To contribute both moral and financial support to the Director(s) and students of the West Lauderdale Band Program.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hospitality-We strive to support the Band Program morale. We have a Hospitality Chairperson and Co-Chairperson to oversee this endeavor. We provide meals throughout Band Camp for the 50+ students and Director's. We have a Student/Parent Social at the end of the camp with food and games. We provide food before away football games. We have a Thanksgiving Meal for the High School Band Students. We provide snacks for the 5th Grade Fitting Night. We host a Middle School Band Mixer for 6th-8th Grade students at the end of the school year. We host an End of the Year Banquet for High School Band Students and their parents. Approximately 110 students, their parents, and the Director's benefit from this program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 74% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 62.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.