Wiseheart Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455085493
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9014103633
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $349,084
- Expenses
- $269,793
- Assets
- $281,657
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD VINING (PRESIDENT AND BOARD DIRECT)
Highest reported compensation
- LEN E HARDISON (DIRECTOR): $154,818 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wiseheart foundation was formed to connect philanthropic christian donors with an avenue to enhance the tax advantages of a charitable foundation, while growing and empowering the donor's ability to support god honoring ministries and other not-for-profit organizations in a way to maximize the greatest impact.
What it reported doing in 2024
The wiseheart foundation's focus is to partner with or come alongside well operated and vetted god-honoring charities, ministry groups and other organizations to assist them with resources, strategies and funding to help them fulfill their mission or purpose. We work diligently to connect our donors with these ministries and/or other organizations and help them be empowered in their work. Wiseheart works continually to minimize the operational costs of the foundation to maximize the funding ability in support of these charities. Funding of operations comes from a 1% annual fee charged against all donor advised funds. Oversight and approval of all fund charges as well as grants given is under the guidelines established for such purposes and approved by the board of directors. Management costs are kept to a minimum to maximize the ability of our donors to give to effective ministry causes and are always transparent. Wiseheart stands in the gap between donors and ministries or organizations to help donors make more effective contributions and accomplish their philanthropic goals.we understand that many donors are not satisfied with their charitable giving and feel unsure whether or not their donation is making a difference. We understand that it is difficult for many to know if a particular ministry is doing valid work. Wiseheart exists to provide donors with strategic giving options to trust that their contributions are effective and used faithfully. Wiseheart aspires to help the donor give generously and effectively to an organization or god-honoring cause for which they have a passion. We want to help our donors: *design a giving strategy to maximize charitable gifts aligned with their passion
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.9% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $242K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 7 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.