Wisconsin Women's Health Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391900678
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Madison, WI, US
Phone
608.251.1675
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,682,216
Expenses
$2,380,257
Assets
$7,552,408
Liabilities
$131,055

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUE ANN THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CAROL MARKOS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TOMMI THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TOMMI THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $125,718 total reported compensation
  • SUE ANN THOMPSON (PRESIDENT): $69,325 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To innovate, impact, and improve women's health throughout the state.

What it reported doing in 2024

Outreach, education, and screening - the Wisconsin women's health foundation (wwhf) provides women's health services and education for women and families. We have statewide programs in all 72 Wisconsin counties. The wwhf services and research initiatives are rooted in evidenced-based prevention of the diseases and conditions that most impact Wisconsin women's health. Grapevine partners with nurses and community health education specialists (ches) who volunteer to conduct educational sessions in their communities. Partners bring health education and resources to rural and underserved individuals throughout Wisconsin and connect individuals to the health resources within their own community. The goal of grapevine is to educate about chronic disease prevention and healthy lifestyle changes. There were 1,104 people who attended a grapevine session.the units we have for grapevine include gynecologic cancers, diabetes prevention, brain health, heart health, mental health, advance care planning, self-care, coping with stress, sleep, opioid misuse, nutrition, bone health, and breast health. Wwhf also holds annual events, which may include workshops, exhibits, lectures, health screenings, and educational materials. All programming in this category works to connect individuals to local health resources. We publish a newsletter twice a year and email monthly newsletters which feature articles on a variety of health topics, program updates and success stories, grants and award recognition, and donor recognition. Wwhf also works with the Wisconsin well woman program/wisewoman programs on education, screening, and connecting women with resources in the areas of breast and cervical cancer, ms, and cardiovascular disease. The wwhf is a community partner on two projects, mammographic quality initiative & collaborative work group project, aimed at imporving cancer disparities across Wisconsin. These projects were created by a transdisciplinary group, the community & cancer science network, to explore and solve preventable differences in breast and lung cancer. The wwwf also created and operates the well badger program. Well badger is a health information and referral service, in partnership with the wi department of health services, connecting people in Wisconsin to resources. Well badger provides an online, dynamic directory of over 7,500 services, programs, and resources. Our team regularly updates and creates new content and resources to address unmet needs. There were over 17,000 people who used the well badger directory resulting in over 140,000 page views and over 364,000 page events. The program has a children's mental health navigator tool for parents, which was used by 652 people. In addition, they provide one-on-one connection through certified i&r specialists and offer six confidential ways to connect. All i&r staff are airs certified, a professional program for individuals working within the i&r sector of human services. They are trained to establish rapport, conduct an assessment, provide an informed choice of referrals, engage in follow-up and if required, provide advocacy or crisis intervention. The well badger i&r specialsits handled 2,946 cases and made over 14,605 referrals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 75% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.17; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.