Wisconsin Track Coaches Assn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721549969
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- South Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Phone
- 4145883497
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,107
- Expenses
- $91,694
- Assets
- $126,338
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISIE WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- OWEN JARRETTE (PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- CHRISIE WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- OWEN JARRETTE (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- KAREN KRAKOW (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and foster track and field athletics in Wisconsin high schools. To help resolve mutual problems of track coaches and provide opportunities for professional growth and fellowship. To always function within the framework of the state high school coaches federation. To endeavor to achieve and maintain the highest possible standards in track and field coaching and officiating. To strive for good public relations and communications so as to promote and publicize the sport. To study proposed rule changes and make recommendations to the appropriate state committee. To support student-athletes through yearly scholarships, if sufficient funds are available.
What it reported doing in 2025
In exchange for a fee school track coaches located in Wisconsin can attend various clinics in which they can learn how to operate and improve the track programs offered to students in schools located in the state of Wisconsin
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.1%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.1%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.1% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.