Wisconsin Judicare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391170880
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wausau, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7158421681
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Legal Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,248,874
- Expenses
- $4,289,070
- Assets
- $2,258,263
- Liabilities
- $781,679
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BETH ANN RICHLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BETH ANN RICHLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $150,272 total reported compensation
- JOAN WHITE (FINANCE DIRECTOR (THRU 12/24)): $127,322 total reported compensation
- AMANDA MAYER (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $121,823 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wisconsin judicare's mission is to provide legal assistance to those who otherwise cannot afford it.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mission of Wisconsin judicare, inc. Dba judicare legal aid [jla] is to provide legal assistance to those who otherwise cannot afford it. Jla is committed to providing high quality legal services. Jla has staff that provide direct representation, as well as education for clients and their families, providing rights and responsibilities under the law. Staff members also provide education to the bar and the community in ways to address the diverse needs of our service population.during this fiscal year, jla provided legal services in 2,678 cases in various subjects. The breakdown of those subjects is below. To provide these services, jla used the services...(continued on schedule o)of nineteen paid staff attorneys, six legal advocates, four paralegals and 80 private attorneys and tribal lay advocates. Jla's work benefits the public in many ways. Cases move more quickly and more efficiently through the legal system when an attorney represents a party to the case. By providing attorneys to represent parties, jla empowers our low-income clients to achieve fairer outcomes and navigate an incredibly complicated legal system. Jla also plays a part supporting victims of violence as they face safety concerns, leaving an abusive spouse, or being the victim in a criminal case. Through jla's legal assistance, victims are equipped with the tools to help them toward a future of safety, stability, and healing. In addition to direct legal services, jla also provides resources for community members forced to engage with the legal system without an attorney, and free mediation to resolve eviction, debt, and other small claims cases outside of the court system. These programs increase our ability to help community members with legal questions, court forms, and finding solutions that can be beneficial for all involved. These programs help reduce unjust outcomes in our legal system that are fueled by inequity in access to legal information and representation. Finally, as jla is a recipient of federal legal services corporation funds, there is no longer a prohibition from requesting and receiving attorney fee awards. The legal services corporation regulations regarding this requirement were modified in december 2009. Jla does not collect fees for services from clients.case summary by subject:*1 adoption*12 adult guardianship/conservatorship*686 advanced directives/powers of attorney*178 bankruptcy/debtor relief*51 collect/repossession/defense/garnishment*17 criminal record expungement*292 custody/visitation*1 delinquent*1 discipline (including expulsion and suspension)*279 divorce/sep./annul.*50 domestic abuse*40 employee rights*4 employment discrimination*86 federally subsidized housing*12 food stamps*1 home and community based care*24 homeownership/real property (not foreclosure)*4 housing discrimination*8 indian/tribal law*13 licenses (drivers, occupational, and others)*3 loans/installment purchases (not collections)*2 long term health care facilities*9 medicaid*19 minor guardianship/conservatorship*40 mobile homes*26 mortgage foreclosures (not predatory lending/practices)*9 neglected/abused/dependent*2 other consumer/finance*1 other education*2 other employment*1 other family*2 other health*6 other housing*5 other income maintenance*24 other individual rights*3 other juvenile*8 pardons*6 parental rights termination*11 paternity*1 private health insurance*296 private landlord/tenant*44 public housing*2 public utilities*4 social security (not ssdi)*1 special education/learning disabilities*26 ssdi*60 ssi*1 state and local income maintenance*3 support*1 taxes (not eitc)*1 torts*41 unemployment compensation*10 wage claims and other flsa issues*248 wills and estates
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $26.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $123K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.