Wisconsin Environmental Health Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237049238
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Osceola, WI, USA
Phone
7154170940
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$119,596
Expenses
$114,825
Assets
$157,558
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NICOLE KRAGNESS (PRESIDENT)
  • MADELINE WOJCIUK (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • ENAM MATTI (NORTHEASTERN VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • LINDSAY NEITZEL (NORTHWESTERN VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • MAYRA CASTENEDA (SOUTHEASTERN VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL OTZELBERGER (SOUTHWESTERN VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NICOLE KRAGNESS (PRESIDENT)
  • MADELINE WOJCIUK (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • BRIAN LONG (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of weha is to maintain and improve the standards of performance of professionals in environmental health by encouraging research, education and the dissemination of information.

What it reported doing in 2024

Wisconsin environmental health association (weha) is an organization that consists of volunteers who work together to help strengthen the field of environmental and public health. Members participate to share ideas, educate and learn about a variety of environmental and public health issues. Members also work to move the profession of environmental and public health forward by taking on challenging issues and creating solutions. Weha continues to make an effort to bring in all professionals who are interested and dedicated to the field of environmental and public health.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.2%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.2% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.