Wisconsin Energy Workforce Consortium Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831725391
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Cottage Grove, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6082049820
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,230
- Expenses
- $38,473
- Assets
- $150,604
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RON GRABER (PRESIDENT)
- BJ RAUCKMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RON GRABER (PRESIDENT)
- BJ RAUCKMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID MEGNA (EXECUTIVE SPONSOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the wewc is to identify and develop programmatic solutions that wewc members use to meet the current and future workforce needs of the energy industry in Wisconsin. This will be accomplished through active engagement and partnerships with investor-owned, municipal, and cooperative energy companies, contractors, energy and contractor associations, state economic development, workforce development, and education partners.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education - implement clearly defined education solutions that link industry recognized competencies and credentials to employment opportunities and advancement in the energy industry.strategies:- partner with educators to close existing skill gaps and create a diverse pool of qualified workers for energy jobs. - research opportunities for standardizing pre-employment testing across Wisconsin energy employers and implement standardization as appropriate to reduce redundancy and signal consistent expectations to educators.- assess the skill impact of new technologies and integrate into education pathways.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.9%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 5
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.91; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 85.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.9% of revenue deployed · 5.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.