Wisconsin Designer Craft Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391264898
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Brown Deer, WI, USA
Phone
2623789255
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Visual Arts Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,047
Expenses
$71,533
Assets
$26,871
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEAN WELLS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JEAN WELLS (PRESIDENT)
  • SHERRI SIPPEL (TREASURER)
  • ANN COOK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Wisconsin designer craft council ("wdcc") is committed to the advancement of artists and their art by organizing art shows, studio visits, and workshops that promote, support, inspire and educate regional artists.

What it reported doing in 2021

The majority of Wisconsin designer craft council's (wdcc) resources and time go into organizing and putting on the morning glory fine craft fair that is held on the second weekend in august each year. The fair is free and open to the public for the viewing and sale of approximately 130 artists work from around the united states.wdcc also puts on the winter glory fine craft show every other year which is a similar, but smaller, indoor show on the third weekend of november.wdcc also organizes workshops for artists to focus on learning new jewelry, fiber, clay, etc. Techniques.wdcc organizes studio visits that tour local glassblowing, iron working, quilting, ceramic, etc studios. Visitors get to see how artists create their wares and manage their businesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.