Wisconsin Chapter of the American College of Cardiology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300097571
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Raleigh, NC, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,892
- Expenses
- $101,542
- Assets
- $347,287
- Liabilities
- $18,290
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
People named in this filing
- RENUKA JAIN MD FACC FASE (GOVERNOR)
- ANNE O'CONNOR MD (GOVERNOR ELE)
- ANTHONY DEFRANCO MD FACC (SECRETARY/TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization shall be to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases. In carrying out these purposes the chapter shall function, in consultation with the leadership of the college, as a source of advice to local and state governmental and professional organizations concerning issues related to cardiovascular disease. The chapter shall, in the interests of patients, physicians, and the public in general, maintain a high level of social consciousness and involvement with socioeconomic factors and access to the highest possible quality of cardiovascular health care. The chapter shall, when mutually advantageous, work in conjunction with other established cardiovascular organizations with the state.
What it reported doing in 2025
Event programs provide educational offerings to cardiologists within Wisconsin. Exhibitors at the annual meeting provide education to the members, new research, ideas and products, social functions allow networking and the opportunity to discuss concerns and ideas relating to the profession.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.42; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.