Wisconsin Automatic Merchandising Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993160707
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cottage Grove, WI, USA
Phone
6082769800
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,313
Expenses
$248
Assets
$34,065
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIKE SWANSON (PRESIDENT)
  • RICK PAVLIC (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MIKE SWANSON (PRESIDENT)
  • RICK PAVLIC (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOE EGGENER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Wisconsin automatic merchandising association (wama) serves as the voice for Wisconsin's convenience, vending and food service companies, working to ensure a favorable business environment for the industry within the state. Wama is involved with lobbying efforts, focusing on regulations, taxes, and promoting coin-operated food/beverage services in Wisconsin.

What it reported doing in 2025

Wama focuses on advocacy by lobbying on tax and regulatory issues affecting vending machine operators, provides industry support by representing businesses involved with vending, micro-markets, and office coffee service and provides information, events and resources for members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.7%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 99.3%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 137.36; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $248 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.