Winsome Riding Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822135857
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Randolph, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7747661331
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,822
- Expenses
- $131,001
- Assets
- $23,877
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY J MULLIN (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- AMY J MULLIN (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTINA CASALI (TREASURER & DIRECTOR)
- ANDREW PAISNER (SECRETARY & DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a variety of therapeutic equine programs in a fun, safe, structured environment. To offer a unique learning experience for children and adults with physical, emotional and social challenges through the therapeutic benefits of equine assisted activities; to be a collaborating partner with healthcare and educational institutions; to conduct such other related business, trade, purpose, programs, or activities as may be carried out by a corporation organized under Massachusetts general laws chapter 180 and described in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide a variety of therapeutic equine programs in a fun, safe, structured environment. To offer a unique learning experience for children and adults with physical, emotional and social challenges through the therapeutic benefits of equine assisted activities;
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 41.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.