Winona Volunteer Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237376207
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Winona, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5074525591
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,902,148
- Expenses
- $1,588,914
- Assets
- $7,005,853
- Liabilities
- $611,111
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER BAGSHAW (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MATT ESCH (PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY SCHINDELDECKER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SANDRA BURKE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA BURKE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $101,067 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
With dedicated volunteers and partners, we help people address life's challenges in a respectful and dignified manner. We do this through coordinated assistance, food programs, home delivered meals, special projects, nutrition education and clothes shop. Wvs relies on volunteers to provide direct assistance in our major programs. Wvs was recertified through the points of light foundation as a service enterprise organization. This demonstrates how committed wvs is to effectively delivering on our mission by aligning volunteer passions and skills with meaningful volunteer positions.
What it reported doing in 2025
Over the last couple of decades, wvs developed the coordinated assistance program. Our partners- the local churches, law enforcement and other service providers- tell anyone looking for assistance that wvs is the one-stop-shop in winona county for people experiencing unexpected circumstances. Our client services coordinator utilizes a network of community resources to make appropriate referrals or issue vouchers according to specific guidelines. Since winona has abundant resources, referring individuals to our centralized hub saves everyone time, makes getting help simpler, and ultimately reduces duplication of services. Wvs is also fortunate that a specialized fund from the winona community foundation allows us to issue vouchers for gasoline, bus tickets, lodging, diapers, cab rides, clothing, rent, dental services and id's, etc. Based on each individual's challenging situations. Through the coordinated assistance program, 432 vouchers were issued to 508 households for gasoline, lodging, transportation, car repair, rent, & miscellaneous assistance totaling $36,431. This includes households who received vouchers to our clothes shop for $2,388 in free clothing. Law enforcement & winona health issued 30 of these vouchers after-hours and on holidays. 47% of the expenses were related to housing and/or shelter. Our nutrition educator helps people acquire the skills and knowledge necessary to improve their nutritional wellbeing. She talks with individuals in the food shelf and on the telephone about the meals they prepare with the food shelf items. Additionally, she monitors the food inventory by placing weekly orders with our channel one food bank and coordinates the "groceries on the go" program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.41; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.