Winona Senior Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411936536
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Winona, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5074543650
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,586,004
- Expenses
- $14,302,246
- Assets
- $13,262,614
- Liabilities
- $780,777
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rachelle Heising-Schultz (President/CEO/Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Matthew Broghammer MD (Director): $632,019 total reported compensation
- Rachelle Heising-Schultz (President/CEO/Director): $581,915 total reported compensation
- Katrina Hammel MD (Director): $422,762 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire, recognize, and empower the caregivers in all of us.
What it reported doing in 2024
Winona Senior Services, Inc. (WSS) supports and serves the healthcare needs of senior citizens living in the Winona, Minnesota, region. It includes the following services:* Lake Winona Manor, a 80-bed skilled, long-term care nursing facility* Watkins Manor, an assisted living facility with 53 units. * Adith Miller and Roger Metz Manors, memory care residences that provide a home to up to 20 dementia-affected individuals. * Winona Area Hospice Services, caring for an average of 43 residents per day with terminal illnesses(Continued on Schedule O)Additional programs that benefit the community include: Health Professional Training: WSS works closely with nurse education programs in the community to provide clinical sites for LPNs, RNs, and CNAs for assistance and training completion with our residents. Students provide supervised nursing care. We also provide practicums for the therapeutic recreation and social work students through Winona State University. Preventive Care: WSS encourages preventive care through a number of resources. WSS participates in a number of educational opportunities for the community on topics relating to care of the aging parent, home care, Hospice and choosing independent or assisted living. WSS provides ongoing training expenses for certifications (e.g., Trained Medication Assistant programs) at no cost to their employees.Community Relations: WSS works with many area nonprofit organizations to support the care of the elderly and health-related activities. Many staff speak to outside civic, educational and non-profit groups, as well as actively participating in community events. Staff of WSS serve on committees and groups to support the provision of senior care services and advocacy for the local community and throughout the State of Minnesota.Community Education: WSS offers a grief support group. Staff adapted activities to ensure resident safety, minimize the impact of prolonged isolation and incorporated creative ways to involve family. All senior care services offer an active media presence and provide opportunities for families and client supports by engaging in service-related councils.WSS is committed to being a "dementia friendly" community, partnering with other non-profit organizations in the community to care for this vulnerable population. The Namaste program implemented by Lake Winona Manor in May of 2017 seeks to improve the lives of people with advanced dementia, through a spa-like experience. People with dementia are often confused or upset by the noises around them. Residents can have their hair done, nails painted, hands, feet or face massaged, feet or face soaked, while soft, calming music is played and soothing scents (aromatherapy) fill the air. The Namaste program dedicates one-on-one time with the resident while creating a calm and therapeutic environment to help the individual feel less anxious. Charity Care: WSS provides medical care to the community regardless of an individual's ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 68.8%; rating input score 69; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $632K · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.