Winn Employee Relief Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843301459
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6177424500
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Emergency Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$185,312
Expenses
$141,910
Assets
$236,081
Liabilities
$100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK APPLEBY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATRICK APPLEBY (PRESIDENT)
  • LYNNE CHASE (TREASURER)
  • STEVEN DETORE (CLERK)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nature of the activities to be conducted or the purposes of the corporation are to engage in any lawful act or activity permitted under the act, which is charitable, religious, educational and/or scientific in nature, entitling the corporation to exemption from taxation under 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as the some may be amended and in force from time to time (the "code"), including, more particularly, those purposes (the "purposes") set forth in the corporation's certificate of incorporation (the "certificate"). Winn employee relief fund, inc. Was organized for the purpose of helping the employees of winn management group, llc and affiliated entities cope with disasters and unexpected hardships that place undue financial stress on them and their families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Support to the employees of winn management group, llc and affiliated entities cope with disasters and unexpected hardships that place undue financial stress on them and their families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.2%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.2% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $133K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.