Wingspan Gives Back Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463332514
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Frisco, TX, USA
Phone
2147890943
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,251
Expenses
$104,664
Assets
$6,801
Liabilities
$3,836

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KELLY JUDY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KELLY JUDY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARGUERITE MCCLINTON (VP, SECRETARY, TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of wingspan gives back, a non-profit organization, is to engage employees in philanthropic efforts that support our communities and encourage employees to reflect our company's values as responsible corporate citizens. In short, our objective is to help families and help communities. Wingspan gives back inc is organized exclusively for charitable purposes.

What it reported doing in 2014

A total of $2,700 was given to various charitable and non-profit organizations during 2014 including Susan G. Komen North Texas, Viva Brevard Festival Sponsorship, and American Heart Association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 128.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -49.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.