Wine to Water
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208877288
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Boone, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8283559655
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,090,678
- Expenses
- $11,424,252
- Assets
- $11,760,976
- Liabilities
- $4,748,517
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOC HENDLEY (CEO/FOUNDER - BOARD CHAIR)
- RICHARD VANDERBURG (PRESIDENT FROM 02/19/25)
- TINA OWEN (VICE PRESIDENT THRU 03/31/25)
Highest reported compensation
- DOC HENDLEY (CEO/FOUNDER - BOARD CHAIR): $172,049 total reported compensation
- TINA OWEN (VICE PRESIDENT THRU 03/31/25): $146,128 total reported compensation
- PARMOD CHANDNA (COO THRU 08/15/24): $110,724 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wine to water is a global non-profit organization preserving life and dignity through the power of clean water. We provide sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene (wash) solutions through direct field operations and strategic partnerships. By focusing on community-led transformation, we ensure long-term health and safe water access for communities in need through infrastructure development, water filtration technologies, and hygiene education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Dominican republicin the dominican republic, the program emphasizes technical collaboration and the implementation of renewable water systems. This fiscal year, the team focused on deep inter-office learning with the colombia team to strengthen expertise in rainwater harvesting and membrane filter technology. Through these collaborative efforts, the program impacted 6,582 lives in 31 communities, which included the distribution of 236 membrane filters and 422 ceramic filters, the installation of 2 community piped water systems benefiting 366 people, and the implementation of 95 rainwater harvesting systems.colombiawtw's colombia program works in remote areas like the tri-border region of the amazon to improve community health through enhanced hygiene and water access. This year's efforts included the expansion of rainwater harvesting knowledge and the distribution of high-efficiency water filters. The program successfully impacted 9,069 lives, distributing 1,528 membrane filters, providing 48 reusable menstrual products, constructing 2 bathrooms, and building 19 rainwater harvesting systems. The program also supported a cross-border project extending impact into brazil, chile, and peru.tanzaniathe tanzania program focuses on the intersection of water and education, prioritizing systems at or near schools to reduce the time students spend walking for water. Major projects this year included a borehole project at oldadai primary school that serves 930 students and the surrounding community. Overall, the program impacted 4,604 lives through the distribution of 272 ceramic filters, the drilling of 1 new well, and the construction of 2 community water systems. South africathis year, wtw established a country office in south africa, taking over operations of a ceramic filter factory in the hammanskraal province. The program addresses "water shedding" disruptions by providing filtration solutions and wash education to vulnerable households. These inaugural efforts impacted 3,589 lives in the region, involving the distribution of 371 ceramic filters and 500 reusable menstrual products.ugandato address critical water and sanitation needs in districts like kasese and kabarole, wtw established a dedicated in-country team in uganda this year. The team focuses on enhancing hygiene infrastructure through spring harvesting, borehole drilling, and the construction of inclusive latrines. The program reached 5 communities and impacted 5,107 lives, resulting in the distribution of 385 membrane filters and the construction of 2 community water systems. Wash partners the organization partners with other local organizations worldwide to expand our capacity to provide clean water to those in need and broaden our global response. This year, 11 global partners were equipped with 9,639 membrane filters to implement in their community development programming. In total, the organization's work through wash partners impacted 143,105 individuals in 11 countries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.9%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $172K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $100K reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.