Wine Country Chapter of Safari Club International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934511125
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Sonoma, CA, USA
Phone
9165248891
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,538
Expenses
$43,597
Assets
$54,536
Liabilities
$9,524

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARIUS ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY NELSON (VICE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER LIAISON)

People named in this filing

  • DARIUS ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY NELSON (VICE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER LIAISON)
  • ALEXANDER LITTLE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization focuses on the preservation and conservation of wildlife and its habitat through educating the public and supporting youth and veteran's programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Wine country chapter of safari club international provided children with valuable educational experiences on shooting safety and experience for both archery and rifles, along with bird dog training and activities at family field day event. The organization also contributes to veteran support programs, land and wildlife conservation projects through pheasants forever, advocate for hunting freedoms and sustainable wildlife conservation in the state of California and contributed to the hunter action fund at the national sci convention.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 115% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -57.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.