Winchester Girls Youth Lacrosse

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881295658
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Winchester, MA, USA
Phone
7819991420
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,143
Expenses
$73,791
Assets
$59,849
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANITA SASSI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANITA SASSI (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER HARRIS (CLERK)
  • MICHELLE PALLADINO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The winchester girls youth lacrosse program is a 501(c)(3) organization run by winchester residents - many of whom played lacrosse for winchester high and at the collegiate level. We are dedicated to providing an exceptional lacrosse experience for girls residing in winchester. Our mission is to: grow a love for the game in our communityestablish strong lacrosse skills while having fun! Prepare female athletes for those who hope to compete at the high school level.

What it reported doing in 2023

Girls youth lacrosse programs - winchester girls youth lacrosse (wgyl) helps girls that reside in winchester establish a love for lacrosse by enhancing their lacrosse skills and helping prepare them to compete in high school. Wgyl competes in the mass youth lacrosse league, organizes a fall ball league, and hosts an end of the season jamboree for its participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.4%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 69.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 62.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 90.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.