Win Together Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843574682
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2018411990
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $66,333
- Expenses
- $34,181
- Assets
- $53,799
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIELLA KAHANE (President)
People named in this filing
- DANIELLA KAHANE (President)
- JACK SIMONY (Treasurer)
- BATYA GOODMAN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
WIN Together's purpose is to empower women from underserved communities by providing workshops and community specific programming that offers training in negotiation, advocacy and other skills needed for personal and professional success. WIN Together's programming and activities will include i providing scholarships to needs-based women to attend the WIN Women in Negotiation Summits and Workshops to enable them to learn basic negotiation and self-advocacy skills 60, ii internships to help women gain the skills needed to re-enter the workplace 20, iii research around women and negotiation skills as a tool to bridge pay and opportunity gaps for women in the workplace generally 10, and iv though leadership articles on negotiation and women 10.
What it reported doing in 2024
WIN Together is dedicated to empowering women from underserved communities through workshops and community-specific programming that focus on negotiation, advocacy, and essential skills for personal and professional success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.