Win for Her Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331887784
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3166487707
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,545
Expenses
$13,796
Assets
$68,749
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • CAROL JOY DARRAH (OFFICER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide health and medical care in wichita, Kansas and surrounding rural areas, including specifically operating a health and medical care facility in order to provide medical exams, education, support and counseling for women facing a breast cancer diagnosis.

What it reported doing in 2025

(4)to engage in activities that promote the delivery of health care; (5)to foster quality medical care for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status; (6)to promote patient-centered care and decision making, rather than medical care determined by profit motivation or other outside influences that can undermine quality care and positive health outcomes; (7)to administer for win for her purposes property donated to the corporation, including sale, investment and reinvestment thereof; (8)to distribute property or funds for win for her purposes in accordance with the terms of gifts, bequests or devises to the corporation consistent with such purposes, as set forth in these articles of incorporation, or in accordance with determinations made by the board of directors pursuant to these articles of incorporation; (9)to modify any restriction or condition on the distribution of funds for any specified purpose if in the sole judgement of the board of directors such restriction or condition becomes, in effect, unnecessary, obsolete, inappropriate, impractical, incapable of fulfillment or inconsistent with the charitable purposes of the corporation; and (10)to engage in any lawful activity that furthers any of the foregoing purposes, with all the powers conferred on nonprofit corporations under the laws of the state of Kansas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.8%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 83.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.98; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.